Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-30 14:35:27 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E12825BDE8E26C541DE6FF89B571370862F8D8E52EAB005D2D3A49AACC138BC9
Participant Details

Original Note:

The ruling does not permit discrimination against individuals based on LGBTQ identity. "Whether applying a public-accommodation law to compel an artist to speak or stay silent violates the free speech clause of the First Amendment." https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/303-creative-llc-v-elenis/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1674784577376886787
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E12825BDE8E26C541DE6FF89B571370862F8D8E52EAB005D2D3A49AACC138BC9
  • createdAtMillis - 1688135727518
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1674784577376886787E12825BDE8E26C541DE6FF89B571370862F8D8E52EAB005D2D3A49AACC138BC9