Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-30 09:21:16 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E9B2F37EF28AB878CC4F178B4E083AEC2D911EE7269FB415B498CAC07DD7F734
Participant Details

Original Note:

https://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/2023-2024/billengrossed/House/htm/2023-HEBH-4474.htm Legislation as passed cut out protections requiring the the "harassment" to be "repeated and intentional", this opens the law to go by what the plaintiff considers as harassment and not actual definition. As such the law violates its own stated 1st Amendment protections..

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1674535858764935171
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E9B2F37EF28AB878CC4F178B4E083AEC2D911EE7269FB415B498CAC07DD7F734
  • createdAtMillis - 1688116876659
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1674535858764935171E9B2F37EF28AB878CC4F178B4E083AEC2D911EE7269FB415B498CAC07DD7F734