Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-30 01:10:07 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5CAF36D31B94076E64DFAB983A9BB00F2A7AC49CC3EA325A2E50EAF2947661F7
Participant Details

Original Note:

https://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/2023-2024/billengrossed/House/htm/2023-HEBH-4474.htm Legislation as passed cut out protections requiring the the "harassment" to be "repeated and intentional", this opens the law to go by what the plaintiff considers as harassment and not actual definition. As such the law violates its own stated 1st Amendment protections..

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1674535858764935171
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5CAF36D31B94076E64DFAB983A9BB00F2A7AC49CC3EA325A2E50EAF2947661F7
  • createdAtMillis - 1688087407846
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16745358587649351715CAF36D31B94076E64DFAB983A9BB00F2A7AC49CC3EA325A2E50EAF2947661F7