Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-30 06:15:56 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3765CA200B3D098D1F594F1DD96A1CB4D25146094EFEADA49D3A9E63DA23296D
Participant Details

Original Note:

https://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/2023-2024/billengrossed/House/htm/2023-HEBH-4474.htm Legislation as passed cut out protections requiring the the "harassment" to be "repeated and intentional", this opens the law to go by what the plaintiff considers as harassment and not actual definition. As such the law violates its own stated 1st Amendment protections..

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1674535858764935171
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3765CA200B3D098D1F594F1DD96A1CB4D25146094EFEADA49D3A9E63DA23296D
  • createdAtMillis - 1688105756708
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16745358587649351713765CA200B3D098D1F594F1DD96A1CB4D25146094EFEADA49D3A9E63DA23296D