Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-10 08:21:15 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 873F1FDBFBD6C3588FCDDEDCC8C6B35B5F6381D78D379D775D3C5077E1B93381
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is most likely referring to the recent WSJ article about Google’s ad placement violating what advertisers paid for. It is actually the opposite of this tweet, advertisers paid for Skippable ads and instead were getting unskippable ads placed. https://twitter.com/nandoodles/status/1673815393712893955?s=46&t=qq4Cn-Dg8Vgg5kQlHqZ4qg https://www.wsj.com/articles/google-violated-its-standards-in-ad-deals-research-finds-3e24e041

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1674528611213389824
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 873F1FDBFBD6C3588FCDDEDCC8C6B35B5F6381D78D379D775D3C5077E1B93381
  • createdAtMillis - 1688977275432
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1674528611213389824873F1FDBFBD6C3588FCDDEDCC8C6B35B5F6381D78D379D775D3C5077E1B93381