Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-29 23:12:10 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 568CB475D2CE2AAB138F67B7772481E898E786883223523FAC128C5334C3CEFA
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is most likely referring to the recent WSJ article about Google’s ad placement violating what advertisers paid for. It is actually the opposite of this tweet, advertisers paid for Skippable ads and instead were getting unskippable ads placed. https://twitter.com/nandoodles/status/1673815393712893955?s=46&t=qq4Cn-Dg8Vgg5kQlHqZ4qg https://www.wsj.com/articles/google-violated-its-standards-in-ad-deals-research-finds-3e24e041

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1674528611213389824
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 568CB475D2CE2AAB138F67B7772481E898E786883223523FAC128C5334C3CEFA
  • createdAtMillis - 1688080330210
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1674528611213389824568CB475D2CE2AAB138F67B7772481E898E786883223523FAC128C5334C3CEFA