Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-30 09:08:03 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 29E9FA1073245187B3891ADC265908AF3ACE11DDF295C7EA78F9C67AADE844E4
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is most likely referring to the recent WSJ article about Google’s ad placement violating what advertisers paid for. It is actually the opposite of this tweet, advertisers paid for Skippable ads and instead were getting unskippable ads placed. https://twitter.com/nandoodles/status/1673815393712893955?s=46&t=qq4Cn-Dg8Vgg5kQlHqZ4qg https://www.wsj.com/articles/google-violated-its-standards-in-ad-deals-research-finds-3e24e041

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1674528611213389824
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 29E9FA1073245187B3891ADC265908AF3ACE11DDF295C7EA78F9C67AADE844E4
  • createdAtMillis - 1688116083071
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 167452861121338982429E9FA1073245187B3891ADC265908AF3ACE11DDF295C7EA78F9C67AADE844E4