Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-29 22:08:54 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4FA25F6F9A930B6288F58643C865EF3515AFED7FDBEE8948D8FDAB7A09CDC13B
Participant Details

Original Note:

As explained in the SCOTUS opinion below, this case was about 2 universities racially profiling and rejecting Asian American students based only on their race and blocking them for acceptance into their schools although they met school requirements fully https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/20-1199_hgdj.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1674513857421750274
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4FA25F6F9A930B6288F58643C865EF3515AFED7FDBEE8948D8FDAB7A09CDC13B
  • createdAtMillis - 1688076534343
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16745138574217502744FA25F6F9A930B6288F58643C865EF3515AFED7FDBEE8948D8FDAB7A09CDC13B