Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-30 12:41:12 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 18358E62CBCD925B38D13998993A9074247E408691222D8DE8EDE29441FDC261
Participant Details

Original Note:

As explained in the SCOTUS opinion below, this case was about 2 universities racially profiling and rejecting Asian American students based only on their race and blocking them for acceptance into their schools although they met school requirements fully https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/20-1199_hgdj.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1674513857421750274
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 18358E62CBCD925B38D13998993A9074247E408691222D8DE8EDE29441FDC261
  • createdAtMillis - 1688128872929
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 167451385742175027418358E62CBCD925B38D13998993A9074247E408691222D8DE8EDE29441FDC261