Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-29 21:36:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0387C9C0B604660623EEAA8C218A4E5371CD60E372B0002D7290FCCE52995E4D
Participant Details

Original Note:

As explained in the SCOTUS opinion below, this case was about 2 universities racially profiling and rejecting Asian American students based only on their race and blocking them for acceptance into their schools although they met school requirements fully https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/20-1199_hgdj.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1674513857421750274
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0387C9C0B604660623EEAA8C218A4E5371CD60E372B0002D7290FCCE52995E4D
  • createdAtMillis - 1688074574621
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16745138574217502740387C9C0B604660623EEAA8C218A4E5371CD60E372B0002D7290FCCE52995E4D