Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-30 00:10:24 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 249F824553EDA121E17375A13FBFFC47A6BDB5FF2EA19EF24F1E29E84224A4E7
Participant Details

Original Note:

Although explicitly disallowed as a *structural consideration* by the ruling, the majority states that essays about *individual experiences* with race are okay, which creates an incredibly vague grey zone. It is arguably unclear what would(n't) specifically be allowed. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/20-1199_hgdj.pdf (pg. 8)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1674500880526110725
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 249F824553EDA121E17375A13FBFFC47A6BDB5FF2EA19EF24F1E29E84224A4E7
  • createdAtMillis - 1688083824841
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1674500880526110725249F824553EDA121E17375A13FBFFC47A6BDB5FF2EA19EF24F1E29E84224A4E7