Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-05 15:19:58 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CA97892361FF37E81CD2ADDB819DE426DE56D13D7E0026FE8B5E16634A4CF7CA
Participant Details

Original Note:

Legacy admissions were not a part of the case. https://www.supremecourt.gov

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1674468036684787723
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CA97892361FF37E81CD2ADDB819DE426DE56D13D7E0026FE8B5E16634A4CF7CA
  • createdAtMillis - 1688570398280
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1674468036684787723CA97892361FF37E81CD2ADDB819DE426DE56D13D7E0026FE8B5E16634A4CF7CA