Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-29 21:40:29 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B4547B65D7A9EA6DFD797EE41F96675FB163F5AFA10B5D00E2A97424DF7894DB
Participant Details

Original Note:

Legacy admissions were not a part of the case. https://www.supremecourt.gov

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1674468036684787723
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B4547B65D7A9EA6DFD797EE41F96675FB163F5AFA10B5D00E2A97424DF7894DB
  • createdAtMillis - 1688074829070
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1674468036684787723B4547B65D7A9EA6DFD797EE41F96675FB163F5AFA10B5D00E2A97424DF7894DB