Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-29 23:56:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 91D427D7A0942D9660CEB81863244BB06C4D94A470D37BFB8C9BD926E7EEB30C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Legacy admissions were not a part of the case. https://www.supremecourt.gov

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1674468036684787723
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 91D427D7A0942D9660CEB81863244BB06C4D94A470D37BFB8C9BD926E7EEB30C
  • createdAtMillis - 1688082974629
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 167446803668478772391D427D7A0942D9660CEB81863244BB06C4D94A470D37BFB8C9BD926E7EEB30C