Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-30 03:17:08 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4DA8C89616BAB845F7641AED61BC1F2CB4240E3439CA36F4B0EC81B413D259F8
Participant Details

Original Note:

Legacy admissions were not a part of the case. https://www.supremecourt.gov

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1674468036684787723
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4DA8C89616BAB845F7641AED61BC1F2CB4240E3439CA36F4B0EC81B413D259F8
  • createdAtMillis - 1688095028177
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16744680366847877234DA8C89616BAB845F7641AED61BC1F2CB4240E3439CA36F4B0EC81B413D259F8