Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-29 18:29:04 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1DBDA60B62D5BE93715EAB27FD6EB5DA855AE169F8F41ED7ED1E31C4C16C7C9C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Legacy admissions were not a part of the case. https://www.supremecourt.gov

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1674468036684787723
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1DBDA60B62D5BE93715EAB27FD6EB5DA855AE169F8F41ED7ED1E31C4C16C7C9C
  • createdAtMillis - 1688063344523
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16744680366847877231DBDA60B62D5BE93715EAB27FD6EB5DA855AE169F8F41ED7ED1E31C4C16C7C9C