Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-29 17:22:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F33F2FC11F579E204C8DF10189BA9B51D0939B96CC01C0325D178099FA1C95ED
Participant Details

Original Note:

Contrary to other notes, the original tweet refers to membership of the ECHR being the reason UK judgement was reached, but the ECHR making the judgement itself

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1674410109403791361
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F33F2FC11F579E204C8DF10189BA9B51D0939B96CC01C0325D178099FA1C95ED
  • createdAtMillis - 1688059345832
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1674410109403791361F33F2FC11F579E204C8DF10189BA9B51D0939B96CC01C0325D178099FA1C95ED