Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-29 16:37:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D54E3CBB0BC7FC69F2CB9397DD75605588AD1CBF1ADDA14DE98FB3521DBF1532
Participant Details

Original Note:

Contrary to other notes, the original tweet refers to membership of the ECHR being the reason UK judgement was reached, but the ECHR making the judgement itself

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1674410109403791361
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D54E3CBB0BC7FC69F2CB9397DD75605588AD1CBF1ADDA14DE98FB3521DBF1532
  • createdAtMillis - 1688056646475
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1674410109403791361D54E3CBB0BC7FC69F2CB9397DD75605588AD1CBF1ADDA14DE98FB3521DBF1532