Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-29 17:35:56 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A27C24E709893EAFFC585DA1E4CCA6B525104529678B1F0A154C7DC0BB786D95
Participant Details

Original Note:

Contrary to other notes, the original tweet refers to membership of the ECHR being the reason UK judgement was reached, but the ECHR making the judgement itself

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1674410109403791361
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A27C24E709893EAFFC585DA1E4CCA6B525104529678B1F0A154C7DC0BB786D95
  • createdAtMillis - 1688060156724
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1674410109403791361A27C24E709893EAFFC585DA1E4CCA6B525104529678B1F0A154C7DC0BB786D95