Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-29 16:06:37 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1BD6CD1AD591566419FF683359B3FCEF1B3AE9B6BF80B7800C6B511849AF0931
Participant Details

Original Note:

Contrary to other notes, the original tweet refers to membership of the ECHR being the reason UK judgement was reached, but the ECHR making the judgement itself

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1674410109403791361
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1BD6CD1AD591566419FF683359B3FCEF1B3AE9B6BF80B7800C6B511849AF0931
  • createdAtMillis - 1688054797706
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16744101094037913611BD6CD1AD591566419FF683359B3FCEF1B3AE9B6BF80B7800C6B511849AF0931