Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-29 13:58:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 39F5B026F4E10F316D6ADAE9F7DA4AB47228415621C9A2117C7621DE693AED68
Participant Details

Original Note:

Whether or not Brendan Clarke-Smith respected/disrespected the process by tweeting about it after the committee had already made its decision is at this stage a matter of personal opinion. He has not (so far) been found guilty of contempt of Parliament.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1674350034618294272
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 39F5B026F4E10F316D6ADAE9F7DA4AB47228415621C9A2117C7621DE693AED68
  • createdAtMillis - 1688047125433
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 167435003461829427239F5B026F4E10F316D6ADAE9F7DA4AB47228415621C9A2117C7621DE693AED68