Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-29 11:42:28 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 64ED43CC1859818ADC445127BF3D32861F81F867E61CE211E46DCA517519D835
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Aside from the obvious logical fallacy of "it's not what they are, they just identify as it" what would the solution be to create more accurate data on LGBTQ+ statistics? What point is being made? It also says in the image "Share of American adults who IDENTIFY as LGBT"

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1674338309311696898
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 64ED43CC1859818ADC445127BF3D32861F81F867E61CE211E46DCA517519D835
  • createdAtMillis - 1688038948759
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 167433830931169689864ED43CC1859818ADC445127BF3D32861F81F867E61CE211E46DCA517519D835