Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-29 18:22:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FF8F245FCAFAA0AA271426CFE9F60658053C2FD2BF05D63CBDDF74FD496D4478
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is a joke tweet. ICAC did not recommend charges because the offence of misconduct in public office requires proof of elements not essential to constitute corrupt conduct under the ICAC Act. ICAC concluded that there is insufficient admissible evidence for prosecution. https://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/tp/files/84638/Op%20Keppel%20-%20Vol%202.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1674273048281890825
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FF8F245FCAFAA0AA271426CFE9F60658053C2FD2BF05D63CBDDF74FD496D4478
  • createdAtMillis - 1688062975294
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1674273048281890825FF8F245FCAFAA0AA271426CFE9F60658053C2FD2BF05D63CBDDF74FD496D4478