Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-29 05:19:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 47427FB50480500610E5402A72AEFB4CF1D64E0080688579BE983D05D869EFEF
Participant Details

Original Note:

A thorough investigation of history is needed to ensure Reuters just didn’t pick up a story from unreliable sources without proof! Google is reporting same as trending story and so does an Australian paper! But nobody citing reliable historical sources to make it true/credible!

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1674209175281213440
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 47427FB50480500610E5402A72AEFB4CF1D64E0080688579BE983D05D869EFEF
  • createdAtMillis - 1688015985786
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 167420917528121344047427FB50480500610E5402A72AEFB4CF1D64E0080688579BE983D05D869EFEF