Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-29 00:15:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 21BDE8BA72A8A040B7A6BFD2307E09362E214E96A7975933DD4FCEFB2D77E74E
Participant Details

Original Note:

A thorough investigation of history is needed to ensure Reuters just didn’t pick up a story from unreliable sources without proof! Google is reporting same as trending story and so does an Australian paper! But nobody citing reliable historical sources to make it true/credible!

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1674209175281213440
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 21BDE8BA72A8A040B7A6BFD2307E09362E214E96A7975933DD4FCEFB2D77E74E
  • createdAtMillis - 1687997734930
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 167420917528121344021BDE8BA72A8A040B7A6BFD2307E09362E214E96A7975933DD4FCEFB2D77E74E