Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-29 01:08:52 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B163C5983A80F5B3ACDEB6FDA217C12ACA136064D5F2E49359ADA529C45248A5
Participant Details

Original Note:

The author expresses her opinion on why she thinks Amber Heard is the overall winner in the time after the trial despite its outcome. A note is therefore not needed. Furthermore the context of the note is already provided in the article. https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/amber-heard-johnny-depp-trial-metoo-b2364869.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1674138789051093021
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B163C5983A80F5B3ACDEB6FDA217C12ACA136064D5F2E49359ADA529C45248A5
  • createdAtMillis - 1688000932385
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1674138789051093021B163C5983A80F5B3ACDEB6FDA217C12ACA136064D5F2E49359ADA529C45248A5