Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-14 19:26:55 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E5A9D334B43758610E73FE397ACF4E59EEC16FECFA9D1185895E64F9AAF579A0
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet and chart make no claims about causality — the authors intend to point out the % of new revenue from higher prices that ended up as profit instead of going toward production costs. The word “contributor” may seem to suggest causality, but here it’s akin to “explainer”.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1674055730410799110
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E5A9D334B43758610E73FE397ACF4E59EEC16FECFA9D1185895E64F9AAF579A0
  • createdAtMillis - 1692041215532
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1674055730410799110E5A9D334B43758610E73FE397ACF4E59EEC16FECFA9D1185895E64F9AAF579A0