Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-26 12:35:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D0B3ABA786BFDF1CFD0BE194CF877E8FB52C4D1F812CC98EF5691CC40C37ED9B
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note needed. I don't think that it's necessary to mention Scott's criminal history, given that it doesn't negate his expertise as a weapons inspector.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1673235507042729984
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D0B3ABA786BFDF1CFD0BE194CF877E8FB52C4D1F812CC98EF5691CC40C37ED9B
  • createdAtMillis - 1687782931569
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1673235507042729984D0B3ABA786BFDF1CFD0BE194CF877E8FB52C4D1F812CC98EF5691CC40C37ED9B