Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-26 08:49:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3441E171F30BCC2BED953A474A3E94F1ED0E0A5886F5FE45D074873DEE563FA3
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note needed. I don't think that it's necessary to mention Scott's criminal history, given that it doesn't negate his expertise as a weapons inspector.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1673235507042729984
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3441E171F30BCC2BED953A474A3E94F1ED0E0A5886F5FE45D074873DEE563FA3
  • createdAtMillis - 1687769345447
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16732355070427299843441E171F30BCC2BED953A474A3E94F1ED0E0A5886F5FE45D074873DEE563FA3