Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-26 11:37:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 23D69B90F97839F430CA61EB943345493C01C90F5DD6F3A0307BDF9813A026A8
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note needed. I don't think that it's necessary to mention Scott's criminal history, given that it doesn't negate his expertise as a weapons inspector.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1673235507042729984
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 23D69B90F97839F430CA61EB943345493C01C90F5DD6F3A0307BDF9813A026A8
  • createdAtMillis - 1687779467413
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 167323550704272998423D69B90F97839F430CA61EB943345493C01C90F5DD6F3A0307BDF9813A026A8