Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-26 19:23:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F0403FB56922D0E57384740B4DE59521CDFB8AFD6769AC30AE3427F23D8B8F8F
Participant Details

Original Note:

1. Forbes has used the data available at a given time. It would not be fair to change the rules for a single person by including donations published later, as this could also apply to others. 2. comparing absolute numbers misses the point.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1673019005479661574
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F0403FB56922D0E57384740B4DE59521CDFB8AFD6769AC30AE3427F23D8B8F8F
  • createdAtMillis - 1687807439084
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1673019005479661574F0403FB56922D0E57384740B4DE59521CDFB8AFD6769AC30AE3427F23D8B8F8F