Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-24 21:05:57 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EA993A3F8C0DE6EC6A5E70B8569911D714C9096E202BB7AF7192650FA2C1F165
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no reporting from any news outlet or government agency to support this claim. The account in question is known to repeatedly spread misinformation. https://thecritic.co.uk/the-curious-case-of-rs-archer/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1672666488895840257
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EA993A3F8C0DE6EC6A5E70B8569911D714C9096E202BB7AF7192650FA2C1F165
  • createdAtMillis - 1687640757324
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1672666488895840257EA993A3F8C0DE6EC6A5E70B8569911D714C9096E202BB7AF7192650FA2C1F165