Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-25 10:25:56 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D837569E9182A140D708FA21B0B69D0E0652DABC095B21E2CAA45D6C76BD5828
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no reporting from any news outlet or government agency to support this claim. The account in question is known to repeatedly spread misinformation. https://thecritic.co.uk/the-curious-case-of-rs-archer/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1672666488895840257
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D837569E9182A140D708FA21B0B69D0E0652DABC095B21E2CAA45D6C76BD5828
  • createdAtMillis - 1687688756892
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1672666488895840257D837569E9182A140D708FA21B0B69D0E0652DABC095B21E2CAA45D6C76BD5828