Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-25 08:46:16 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BD0CB810166D2F7CB7FA87EA94C18509F94D94BB5D81E5B23115739B722A2F28
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no reporting from any news outlet or government agency to support this claim. The account in question is known to repeatedly spread misinformation. https://thecritic.co.uk/the-curious-case-of-rs-archer/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1672666488895840257
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BD0CB810166D2F7CB7FA87EA94C18509F94D94BB5D81E5B23115739B722A2F28
  • createdAtMillis - 1687682776633
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1672666488895840257BD0CB810166D2F7CB7FA87EA94C18509F94D94BB5D81E5B23115739B722A2F28