Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-16 09:37:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 197E1BFCEC10CFED51945ECE6FD73F1FC73276BE80A02371E84E2AB53563AB4D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Es werden Behauptungen zu Tatsachen verklärt: Auf dem Artikel übersetzt: Aufgrund dieser inhärenten Einschränkungen müssen Ergebnisse dieser Auswertung, als Hypothesen erzeugend angesehen werden und können nicht verwendet werden, um Kausalität festzustellen. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/eci.13998

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1672550525554900993
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 197E1BFCEC10CFED51945ECE6FD73F1FC73276BE80A02371E84E2AB53563AB4D
createdAtMillis - 1715852245904
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1672550525554900993197E1BFCEC10CFED51945ECE6FD73F1FC73276BE80A02371E84E2AB53563AB4D