Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-24 00:32:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5ED12CBE42267A916938564DD325D774C51E24B31C05D1E983394139A3309326
Participant Details

Original Note:

The UK judgment relied on evidence that was later discredited in the US. In the UK, Heard wasn’t required to submit all discovery because she wasn’t a party. She was in the US, where a jury found that Heard defamed Depp with actual malice by lying that he abused her. https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/sites/circuit/files/assets/documents/pdf/high-profile/depp%20v%20heard/cl-2019-2911-order-6-24-2022.pdf (https://t.co/oTqM58i2oF) https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Judgment-FINAL.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1672395204291338240
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5ED12CBE42267A916938564DD325D774C51E24B31C05D1E983394139A3309326
  • createdAtMillis - 1687566754662
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16723952042913382405ED12CBE42267A916938564DD325D774C51E24B31C05D1E983394139A3309326