Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-24 04:55:10 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C49B2C1FDD06F5AC9F67D9CCA558B48B11B0D5880EA509D08963460204D52A5B
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet makes no claims of GOF research in the current grant, just a connection with specific Chinese scientists

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1672392024086007810
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C49B2C1FDD06F5AC9F67D9CCA558B48B11B0D5880EA509D08963460204D52A5B
  • createdAtMillis - 1687582510438
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1672392024086007810C49B2C1FDD06F5AC9F67D9CCA558B48B11B0D5880EA509D08963460204D52A5B