Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-24 02:13:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 710C79BB3E0B4FC7B9C096911026839D225D38C4B2BC7FA4AD02CC10F9F87AA2
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet makes no claims of GOF research in the current grant, just a connection with specific Chinese scientists

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1672392024086007810
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 710C79BB3E0B4FC7B9C096911026839D225D38C4B2BC7FA4AD02CC10F9F87AA2
  • createdAtMillis - 1687572794300
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1672392024086007810710C79BB3E0B4FC7B9C096911026839D225D38C4B2BC7FA4AD02CC10F9F87AA2