Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-23 11:05:52 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 23F1DDA588D6D5286414A9FA10FE6D7A8F600FF3F02F8A007DC2381F177B7B52
Participant Details

Original Note:

The WSJ part is factual, the part after “but” is Jack’s personal opinion . Note note needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1672181731393150979
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 23F1DDA588D6D5286414A9FA10FE6D7A8F600FF3F02F8A007DC2381F177B7B52
  • createdAtMillis - 1687518352803
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 167218173139315097923F1DDA588D6D5286414A9FA10FE6D7A8F600FF3F02F8A007DC2381F177B7B52