Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-23 10:56:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0E23F3910AF85B7AB12C71D3009FCF5C6215801C8EFFDE7E16A19F12A2B78003
Participant Details

Original Note:

Quanto scritto in questo Tweet si configura in potenziale violazione con i seguenti articoli del codice deontologico FNOMCEO: Art 1, Art 3, Art 11, Art 16, Art 33, Art 59 Fonte: https://portale.fnomceo.it/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/CODICE-DEONTOLOGIA-MEDICA-2014-e-aggiornamenti.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1672021427493502978
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0E23F3910AF85B7AB12C71D3009FCF5C6215801C8EFFDE7E16A19F12A2B78003
  • createdAtMillis - 1687517785099
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16720214274935029780E23F3910AF85B7AB12C71D3009FCF5C6215801C8EFFDE7E16A19F12A2B78003