Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-24 02:54:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C14E909AB1A6EAAEC0AE282B0610D63BA6A89327093F0CA4ADC2CF16668AE44F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - debate amongst random yahoos on the Internet with no training or research experience is not the same as rigorous scientific debate in peer reviewed journals.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1671937687329144832
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C14E909AB1A6EAAEC0AE282B0610D63BA6A89327093F0CA4ADC2CF16668AE44F
  • createdAtMillis - 1687575262199
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1671937687329144832C14E909AB1A6EAAEC0AE282B0610D63BA6A89327093F0CA4ADC2CF16668AE44F