Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-23 13:20:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 953A9A19C02DB60299D30E7F3220F6F9C3CAA58BD80B6ABB58298E7729BB6050
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - debate amongst random yahoos on the Internet with no training or research experience is not the same as rigorous scientific debate in peer reviewed journals.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1671937687329144832
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 953A9A19C02DB60299D30E7F3220F6F9C3CAA58BD80B6ABB58298E7729BB6050
  • createdAtMillis - 1687526459541
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1671937687329144832953A9A19C02DB60299D30E7F3220F6F9C3CAA58BD80B6ABB58298E7729BB6050