Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-23 09:30:57 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4E9C8D9123E6E92431DA4595B2B9E3215D3B6109113A8DB4ED922CC5955BE521
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - debate amongst random yahoos on the Internet with no training or research experience is not the same as rigorous scientific debate in peer reviewed journals.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1671937687329144832
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4E9C8D9123E6E92431DA4595B2B9E3215D3B6109113A8DB4ED922CC5955BE521
  • createdAtMillis - 1687512657910
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16719376873291448324E9C8D9123E6E92431DA4595B2B9E3215D3B6109113A8DB4ED922CC5955BE521