Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-23 01:20:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2A4DBCF18EEFCC9EDB8BB03FB5F1D0B72490E9F68D271CEF82BBE8E80CC1DA43
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - debate amongst random yahoos on the Internet with no training or research experience is not the same as rigorous scientific debate in peer reviewed journals.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1671937687329144832
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2A4DBCF18EEFCC9EDB8BB03FB5F1D0B72490E9F68D271CEF82BBE8E80CC1DA43
  • createdAtMillis - 1687483214079
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16719376873291448322A4DBCF18EEFCC9EDB8BB03FB5F1D0B72490E9F68D271CEF82BBE8E80CC1DA43