Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-22 19:11:46 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: ADEEC4437ED757FDAEC769C5F27C2B8B9353A267B94185374C0DD51CEA174B60
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet correctly presents Hiltzik’s position on debating someone anti-vaccine and the linked article provides more context regarding that opinion. Presenting arguments for opposing opinions is not the purpose of community notes. Note not needed. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/values

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1671899488099917827
participantId -
raterParticipantId - ADEEC4437ED757FDAEC769C5F27C2B8B9353A267B94185374C0DD51CEA174B60
createdAtMillis - 1687461106216
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1671899488099917827ADEEC4437ED757FDAEC769C5F27C2B8B9353A267B94185374C0DD51CEA174B60