Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-22 17:30:28 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F916864CB98C114C8FBB6CC22858C56181B630B386F99DE9ECC5A2CD47532115
Participant Details

Original Note:

This was a reintroduced bill which failed last year, which some lawmakers argued violates religious freedom. https://www.markey.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/right_to_contraception_act_-_061423pdf.pdf https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/healthcare/house-passes-contraception-bill-despite-religious-freedom-fears It is also claimed that the bill used an overly broad definition of contraception and could provide funding for abortion providers and "abortion-inducing drugs." https://www.kiro7.com/news/local/bill-reintroduced-congress-gives-federal-protection-right-birth-control-access/ALFUIG3X65CZXMS3GVOH2HYTTQ/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1671859494651850753
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F916864CB98C114C8FBB6CC22858C56181B630B386F99DE9ECC5A2CD47532115
  • createdAtMillis - 1687455028174
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1671859494651850753F916864CB98C114C8FBB6CC22858C56181B630B386F99DE9ECC5A2CD47532115