Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-22 13:54:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C7E50CDAB91E52D696CF4766293C92C79987655963CD243B8E45771833F19566
Participant Details

Original Note:

The opinion expressed by Rowling and others is about the use of the term “cis” in the context of genders, not about the scientific terms used in chemistry. The two terms are similar, but aren’t synonymous: https://dictionary.apa.org/cisgender https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cis%E2%80%93trans_isomerism?wprov=sfti1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1671816817432576000
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C7E50CDAB91E52D696CF4766293C92C79987655963CD243B8E45771833F19566
  • createdAtMillis - 1687442072355
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1671816817432576000C7E50CDAB91E52D696CF4766293C92C79987655963CD243B8E45771833F19566