Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-22 11:47:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4E5743C652F3801F461FE559BEEE741F7F016098F206E963AA11A47F6BFE437F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The opinion expressed by Rowling and others is about the use of the term “cis” in the context of genders, not about the scientific terms used in chemistry. The two terms are similar, but aren’t synonymous: https://dictionary.apa.org/cisgender https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cis%E2%80%93trans_isomerism?wprov=sfti1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1671816817432576000
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4E5743C652F3801F461FE559BEEE741F7F016098F206E963AA11A47F6BFE437F
  • createdAtMillis - 1687434428706
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16718168174325760004E5743C652F3801F461FE559BEEE741F7F016098F206E963AA11A47F6BFE437F