Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-23 10:11:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3EB4380402FFE49182D58FA8A392F9B0795BC7F7859DAAE73946ED3D6B7D5AA2
Participant Details

Original Note:

The opinion expressed by Rowling and others is about the use of the term “cis” in the context of genders, not about the scientific terms used in chemistry. The two terms are similar, but aren’t synonymous: https://dictionary.apa.org/cisgender https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cis%E2%80%93trans_isomerism?wprov=sfti1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1671816817432576000
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3EB4380402FFE49182D58FA8A392F9B0795BC7F7859DAAE73946ED3D6B7D5AA2
  • createdAtMillis - 1687515101513
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16718168174325760003EB4380402FFE49182D58FA8A392F9B0795BC7F7859DAAE73946ED3D6B7D5AA2