Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-22 10:04:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 37110A0A4A5FD871823C920569006E90C3C8ACF60317F9E53268E2AF67310182
Participant Details

Original Note:

The opinion expressed by Rowling and others is about the use of the term “cis” in the context of genders, not about the scientific terms used in chemistry. The two terms are similar, but aren’t synonymous: https://dictionary.apa.org/cisgender https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cis%E2%80%93trans_isomerism?wprov=sfti1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1671816817432576000
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 37110A0A4A5FD871823C920569006E90C3C8ACF60317F9E53268E2AF67310182
  • createdAtMillis - 1687428267437
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 167181681743257600037110A0A4A5FD871823C920569006E90C3C8ACF60317F9E53268E2AF67310182